we list sites where you can find out the truth
for yourself

THE BILL OF RIGHTS
THE DECLARATION
OF INDEPENDENCE

Read THE CONSTITUTION
OF THE UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA

AMENDMENTS TO
THE CONSTITUTION

instantballot.com

Anything done has to be peaceful and nonviolent but make yourself heard.

nra news

save capitalism

climate change
ripoff

healthcare

take control

the plan

 

Raise your voice on this

Regulatory Czar

read more

 

fox news-delivers up-to-the-minute news and information on the latest top stories, weather, entertainment, politics and more

 

HANNITY

Cap and Trade!
Rep. Mike Pence;
Dick Morris;
Newt Gingrich

FairTax.org
MarkLevinShow.com
770 WABC New York
AmericaSupports
You.mil

BoldBraveCourageous
BondInfo.org



June 26, 2009
On Friday's Mark Levin Show: The cap and trade bill was passed in the House of Representatives, despite our best efforts to have our Congressmen vote against it. If only 4 Republicans out of the 8 that voted for it - voted no, then it wouldn't have passed.

real clear politics

expose libral media bias

imagenext

urban conservative


image call to arms for
all NRA members to vigorously oppose the nomination of Judge Sotomayor
to the Supreme Court.

image bill o'reilly

Its time to vote the politicians who play partisan politics with your rights and life out of office...

fredpac.com


glenn Beck

Cap-and-Trade Is About Power and Control

 

WSJ: Climate bill would be 'biggest tax in American history'

 

What better time to jam the Cap n Trade bill down our throat than on a Friday afternoon when Americans are not paying attention! Why would they want to do that, instead of bask in the glow of America's approval?

 

Comprehensive presentation of gun control and Second Amendment issues;
analysis of firearms statistics, research, and gun control policies,gun
control,Second Amendment,gun laws,gun blog,

donkeydoings elephantdoings

gunblog

thegunblog


travel

Obama Picks Anti-gun Judge for the Supreme Court

 

.mark levin

On Friday's Mark Levin Show: The cap and trade bill was passed in the House of Representatives, despite our best efforts to have our Congressmen vote against it. If only 4 Republicans out of the 8 that voted for it - voted no, then it wouldn't have passed.


The eight who voted for cap and trade are:
The 8 Republicans Who Gave America the Finger
Bono Mack (CA) 202-225-5330
Castle (DE) 202-225-4165
Kirk (IL) 202-225-4835
Lance (NJ) 202-225-5361
Lobiondo (NJ) 202-225-6572
McHugh (NY) 202-225-4611
Reichart (WA) 202-225-7761
Chris Smith (NJ) 202-225-3765

 


THE BILL OF RIGHTS
THE DECLARATION
OF INDEPENDENCE

Read THE CONSTITUTION
OF THE UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA

AMENDMENTS TO
THE CONSTITUTION

 

News widgets and RSS feeds on Feedzilla.com


 

NY Dem Links Norway Shooting to US Gun Laws
Lax U.S. gun laws helped a Norwegian man pull off the deadliest attack in that country since World War II, a House Democrat charged Thursday. Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.) said Anders Behring Breivik — the suspect in last week’s shooting rampage outside Oslo that left 68 dead — exploited weak American weapons laws to arm himself for the attack.


JUST SAY 'NO' TO TAX HIKES!


According to a new study by scientists at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, the strength of an unwavering minority of just 10% can reshape public opinion. Perhaps this is why more and more Americans are ready to watch history in the making by pushing Congress to vote for a balanced budget amendment and set the country on a path to recovery that we have all been waiting for.

"Once 10% of a population is committed to an idea, it's inevitable that it will eventually become the prevailing opinion of the entire group. The key is to remain committed."

"If you stick to your guns, and reach that crucial 10%, your ideas eventually win out."

TELL CONGRESS NO TAX HIKES! SEND YOUR FAXES NOW!

Right now, the White House is calling Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-Ohio), the Grinch for succumbing to the pressure of Conservative Americans who want Congress to Cut, Cap and Balance the budget, and present a balanced budget amendment to the states for ratification.

"White House officials are claiming that [Speaker Boehner is going to steal Christmas away from Americans], as they try to head off passage of Boehner's two-stage debt ceiling bill," the Daily Caller reports.

Speaker Bohner's plan would "provide $900 billion to keep the federal government's spending steady for the next several months, in exchange for a matching spending cut over the next 10 years."

But The White House doesn't like this plan because the government will burn through $900 billion by the end of the year and the Administration wants a blank check that includes an unlimited debt ceiling so they can continue their debt addiction.

Obama wants massive tax hikes and
the biggest debt-limit increase in history!


Do you want your taxes to go up indefinitely...? Well, this is what Obama wants!

CLICK HERE to FAX every member of Congress and DEMAND that they vote to Cut, Cap and Balance the budget, because imposing new taxes on Americans and increasing the debt ceiling indefinitely are not the answers to the government's debt problem!

AS ALWAYS, You can also CLICK HERE to send a FREE message directly to YOUR U.S. Representative and Senators!

President Obama's solution to the government's debt crisis is a get-rich-quick scheme that calls for an increase in your taxes, and massive cuts to defense.

Liberals always want to spend more of your money, and they always want to dismantle out national defense; and to ensure that this debt crisis doesn't go to waste; they're using it to bilk you out of your hard-earned dollars, and rob you of your security.

On Monday, Obama told Americans that he's calling for massive tax hikes, even though unemployment has increased to 9.2% and is only going to get worse.

Then on Wednesday, Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C.), and other House Democrats began pushing Obama to invoke the 14th Amendment to raise the debt ceiling indefinitely and hike Americans' taxes!

Rep. Clyburn said that "... if the president is delivered a bill to raise the debt ceiling for only a short period of time, he should veto it," Politico reports.

"If that's what lands on his desk, a short-term lifting of the ceiling, he should put it on his desk next to an executive order," Rep. Clyburn added. ... "He should sign an executive order invoking the 14th Amendment to this issue."

The ONLY action that Americans want members of Congress to make is to cut spending, place a cap on future spending, and balance the budget by voting for a balanced budget amendment that will be sent to the states.

CLICK HERE to FAX every member of Congress and DEMAND that they vote to Cut, Cap and Balance the budget, because Americans refuse to be fleeced by Obama and his frivolous spending addiction!

AS ALWAYS, You can also CLICK HERE to send a FREE message directly to YOUR U.S. Representative and Senators!

Your faxing efforts have already influenced members of the House to vote to Cut, Cap and Balance, and now we must DEMAND that they continue to fight for hard-working Americans by saying "NO" to an unlimited debt increase, and "NO" to Obama's tax hikes, and push their colleagues join them to Cut, Cap and Balance the budget!

The only crisis we are facing is Obama's spending addiction!

If you believe that the Obama administration needs to go cold-turkey and end its debt addiction, then you need to act now and DEMAND that every member of Congress votes to Cut, Cap and Balance the budget, which would cut spending, and require Congress to approve a balanced budget amendment and submit it to states for ratification before any debt increase happens.

Last year, Obama and his cronies claimed that we would have a "Recovery Summer." But look where we are now!
9.2% unemployment
19.1% ACTUAL unemployment (including those that aren't looking for work anymore)
$14.4 trillion in debt
1.9 million jobs lost since the so called "stimulus"
More people than ever in history are on food stamps
People are on unemployment longer than any time since the Great Depression
59% disapprove of the way Obama is handling the economy
Obama is wasting Americans' hard-earned dollars and he's asking Congress to increase the debt ceiling indefinitely so that he can continue his frivolous spending addiction indefinitely.... Don't let this happen!

TELL CONGRESS NO TAX HIKES! SEND YOUR FAXES NOW!

Cut - the deficit must be cut in half next year. Mandatory and discretionary spending cuts must be made in order to achieve this.

Cap - spending must be capped at 18% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Automatic spending reductions must be put in place if we are about to spend over this amount.

Balance - A Balanced Budget Amendment (BBA) must be sent to the states to ensure that we never reach this crisis again.

CLICK HERE to FAX every member of Congress and DEMAND that they vote to Cut, Cap and Balance the budget and say "NO" to tax hikes and say "NO" to an unlimited increase to the debt ceiling!

AS ALWAYS, You can also CLICK HERE to send a FREE message directly to YOUR U.S. Representative and Senators!

Don't stop now... we must continue to POUND every member of Congress!

The left believes that raising your taxes will solve the problem, but not only will that not cover one year's deficit, it also will only give them more incentive to spend, since they know they can always fall back on higher taxes to pay the bill.

Members of Congress need to know that American taxpayers will not allow Obama's out-of-control spending addiction to continue. We want Congress to CUT spending, CAP spending levels and vote for a Balanced Budget Amendment!

AS ALWAYS, You can also CLICK HERE to send a FREE message directly to YOUR U.S. Representative and Senators!

Members of Congress must do the right thing, and get the government's financial house in order, by voting for a constitutional and permanent solution: Cut, Cap and Balance!

CLICK HERE to say "NO" to Obama's tax hikes!

 


UPDATED PETITION! Don't Tax Churches or Charities, and Don't Raise the Debt Ceiling. Balance the Budget, Pay off the National Debt, Cut Gov't Spending. Please select, sign, and WE WILL FAX your petition to all 535 members of Congress (saving you time!)

Boehner fails to arm-twist 29 Tea Party Republican Congressmen. Help them now!

"The Boehner plan is just another Washington establishment deal," FreedomWorks director Brenden Steinhauser said. "Even if all of the Boehner plan's promised spending trims occur, which is doubtful, in 10 years the national debt will be $23 trillion instead of $24 trillion." But if they don't raise the debt ceiling, the national debt will remain $14.3T.

That's why Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) could not persuade 29 conservative Republican heroes to raise the debt ceiling last night, and fell short by just 4 votes of passing his 3rd attempt to cave in to Democrat demands to raise taxes by $1 Trillion. Because of YOUR FAXES to Congress, conservatives continue to find their backbone.

"Get your ass in line," Boehner reportedly told the rank and file. "I can't do this job unless you're behind me." 213 Republicans got behind him, just 4 votes short of the 217 he needed for passage of a bill. 29 Tea-Party Republicans will not budge, thank God, so the Thursday night vote was delayed until Friday or Saturday, giving us more time to fax Congress, and say "don't raise the debt ceiling, don't tax churches, hold the line."

Heroic Congressmen like Jeff Flake (R-AZ), Louie Gohmert (R-TX), and Trent Franks (R-AZ) reportedly resisted Boehner's arm twisting to raise the debt ceiling, and Michele Bachmann (R-MN) announced she would "never" vote to raise the debt ceiling.

Meanwhile Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said Boehner's plan was too conservative, that it would never pass the Senate without an amendment raising taxes, and President Obama threatened to veto it, and ZERO House Democrats led by Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) voted for Boehner's plan, because it didn't raise taxes enough. With no deal pending, the stock market fell for the fourth day in a row. But even with a deal, Standard & Poor's has threatened to lower the U.S.'s AAA bond rating unless a substantial and credible deficit-reduction deal isn't reached. Moody's has similarly warned of a possible downgrade. [Proof it's the Democrat spending plan hurting the bond ratings.]

As the national debt stands now if you make $30,000 a year your share of the debt is $27,000. That's 90% of your yearly income just to pay off the debt! Just imagine if President Obama spends trillions more. Can YOU afford to owe 100% debt? Let's say no.

SELECT HERE TO SIGN new PETITION TO STOP TAXING CHURCHES, STOP RAISING THE NATIONAL DEBT CEILING, AND BALANCE THE BUDGET, and we will fax 535 Members of the House and Senate instantly, (saving you much time!)

The Senate voted 53-47 last Saturday to reject "Cut, Cap and Balance," the only existing budget plan to balance the federal budget without tax increases on churches.

Thanks to YOUR faxing efforts the House of Representatives passed Cut, Cap and Balance by a 234-190 vote, with nearly all small-government Republicans for, and nearly all big-government Democrats against. Interestingly, two Republican Presidential candidates Michele Bachman (R-MN) and Ron Paul (R-TX) voted against the bill, because it didn't cut enough government spending or repeal Obamacare.

The "Cut, Cap, and Balance Act" H.R. 2560 could reduce the debt by $6 Trillion, but President Obama and Senator Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) both declared their intention to stop or veto any plan that doesn't raise taxes on the Senate floor.

Two other liberal budget plans in the Senate, the "McConnell plan" and the "Gang of Six" plan, both raise taxes by up to $1 Trillion, by targeting CHURCH OFFERING PLATES as the primary victim of the tax increases. AP reports: "A new bipartisan plan to reduce government borrowing would target some of the most cherished tax breaks enjoyed by millions of families...charitable giving...many taxpayers would face higher taxes — a total of at least $1.2 trillion over the next decade, and perhaps more."

Now Compare these four plans that compete with "Cut, Cap and Balance":
--Obama's plan raises the national debt $8Trillion from $14Trillion to $22Trillion by 2022.
--McConnell's plan lets Obama raises the debt ceiling by $2.4 Trillion next year, cutting only $1.5 Trillion from Obama's $8T raise over 10 years, making our future debt $20.5T.
--The "Gang of Six" plan will not be ready by the August 2nd deadline, but could raise $1 Trillion in taxes (including taxes on church offering plates) with just $2.7 Trillion in spending cuts, reducing Obama's $8T ten-year deficit increases by $3.7T, but still increases the national debt from $14T to an irresponsible $18.3Trillion by the year 2022.
--Hero Conservative Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK)'s plan proposed $9 Trillion in real spending cuts, which would eliminate Obama's $8T growth and paying down the national debt by $1T (reducing from $14T to $13T), but he's the only one who'd vote for it.

Only the Cut, Cap, and Balance plan would guarantee future balanced budgets, because only that plan recommends a Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution, controlling all future Democrat spending binges. Its $6Trillion in recommended spending cuts does NOT include $2.5T we could save by cutting Obamacare, so enter Michele Bachmann...

--Bachmann's plan merges a $2.5T Obamacare repeal AND a $6T Cut, Cap, Balance plan, saving $8.5T, without raising the debt ceiling! The national debt moves from $14T to $13.5T over 10 years, and if the economy grows as it should, we could someday ELIMINATE the $13.5T national debt entirely, reducing it to ZERO.

All in favor of the Bachmann plan, say aye? AYE! But first let's petition the Senate to pass Cut, Cap, and Balance this Saturday...

SELECT HERE TO SIGN new PETITION TO STOP TAXING CHURCHES, STOP RAISING THE NATIONAL DEBT CEILING, AND BALANCE THE BUDGET, and we will fax 535 Members of the House and Senate instantly, (saving you much time!)

Remember that movie when the robber holds a gun to grandma's head, and says to her grandchild, "give me all your money, or I'll kill your grandma?"

President Obama held senior citizens hostage, threatening to withhold Social Security [SS] or pension checks from Seniors, Veterans, and the Disabled, unless Republicans raise the debt ceiling and borrow Trillions more from their grandchildren.

"I cannot guarantee that those [SS] checks go out on August 3rd if we haven't resolved this [debt] issue. Because there may simply not be the money in the coffers to do it," Obama told Scott Pelley on the CBS Evening News, [proving Obama plans to rob the Social Security Trust fund, which has surplus money and very solvent, to divert SS money to "other" government programs like welfare which Obama likes more than Seniors.]

Obama added "this is not just a matter of Social Security checks. These are veterans' checks, these are folks on disability and their checks. There are about 70 million checks that go out." [Proving his first spending priority is NOT seniors, veterans, or the disabled.]

Obama already took $500 Billion from seniors' Medicare last year to fund his Obamacare welfare program, quadrupling Medicaid benefits for young people who refuse to work.

Meanwhile, just like Clint Eastwood (not), Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) rushed in save America (not), promising Obama more money without guaranteed spending cuts. Conservative blogger Erick Erickson of RedState explains: "Mitch McConnell is right now talking about making a historic capitulation. So fearful of being blamed for a default, McConnell is proposing a compromise that lets Barack Obama raise the debt ceiling without making any spending cuts at all."

McConnell's plan gives Obama unchecked power to increase the debt ceiling three times in a year spending $2.1 Trillion, which can't be stopped unless 2/3 of both houses override. McConnell would merely ask Obama "would require submission of a plan to reduce spending" without actual accountability. Trust Obama's plan to cut spending?

Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) reminded the press that Obama broke his promise to reduce the deficit by $4 trillion and never told the American people any facts about how he plans to do this. "I think its time for the president to put his plan on the table. And let the American people see just what he [Obama] is proposing." Let's cut government, not SS.

SELECT HERE TO SIGN new PETITION TO STOP TAXING CHURCHES, STOP RAISING THE NATIONAL DEBT CEILING, AND BALANCE THE BUDGET, and we will fax 535 Members of the House and Senate instantly, (saving you much time!)

Secret Decoder: When President Obama says "tax millionaires" he means tax churches. When he says "close loopholes" he means eliminate charitable deduction exemptions, which taxes church offering plates and cripples the poor helped by churches, replacing private charities with government welfare, to pay his massive debt from Obamacare.

Associated Press explained what Obama really means when he says he wants to raise taxes by "eliminating tax loopholes for millionaires and billionaires":

"Among the tax increases proposed by the White House and the amount they'd raise over the next decade:

"- Limit itemized deductions, including those for charitable contributions and mortgage interest, for families and small business owners with high incomes. Under current law, if a taxpayer's top income tax rate is 35 percent - the highest rate - a $100 deduction is worth $35 in tax savings. For several years, Obama has proposed limiting itemized deductions for people making above $250,000 to 28 percent, meaning a $100 deduction would be worth only $28 in tax savings at most. That would raise $293 billion, according to congressional estimates."

Did you catch that? Obama would raise $293 billion by taxing church contributions.

"A similar proposal would gradually phase out itemized deductions for people making more than $500,000, raising 'in the ballpark of $210 billion,' said Maryland Rep. Chris Van Hollen, one of the House Democratic negotiators in the Biden talks."

Did you catch that? Democrats want $210 billion more taxing itemized deductions.

$293 Billion + $210 Billion = $503 Billion in new taxes, by taxing church donations.

But where will the money go? AP says part of the Debt Ceiling problem was created by Obamacare, which just quadrupled the number of Medicaid welfare recipients:

"President Barack Obama's health care law would let several million middle-class people get nearly free insurance meant for the poor, a twist government number crunchers say they discovered only after the complex bill was signed...A married couple could have an annual income of about $64,000 and still get Medicaid, said officials...for the Health and Human Services department....It might be compared to allowing middle-class people to qualify for food stamps....That $64,000 would put them at about four times the federal poverty level, which for a two-person household is $14,710 this year." EARN FOUR TIMES THE POVERTY LEVEL? You qualify for welfare.

Taxing churches who help the poor, simply to replace charities with government welfare? This is how Obama wants to re-structure taxes, while negotiating with Speaker Boehner. (And he's increasing our national debt while doing it.) Let's take a stand against taxing churches to raise the debt ceiling, period.

SELECT HERE TO SIGN new PETITION TO STOP TAXING CHURCHES, STOP RAISING THE NATIONAL DEBT CEILING, AND BALANCE THE BUDGET, and we will fax 535 Members of the House and Senate instantly, (saving you much time!)

Congressional accountants now admit America will be officially bankrupt in 10 years, in the National Journal: "In 2021, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) now predicts debt will reach 76 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), but under a more dire—and more likely—scenario, the public debt will be 101 percent of GDP 10 years from now."

Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC) just joined 10 Senators to launch the new "cut, cap, balance" pledge yesterday, which you can join here, endorsing a House Republican Study Committee plan to:
1) Cut - Substantial cuts in spending that will reduce the deficit next year and thereafter.
2) Cap - Enforceable spending caps that will put federal spending on a path to a balanced budget.
3) Balance - Congressional passage of a Balanced Budget Amendment to the U.S. Constitution -- but only if it includes both a spending limitation and a super-majority for raising taxes, in addition to balancing revenues and expenses.

In the first day 10 Senators and 15 Congressmen signed the pledge, and we updated our fax petition to demand all Sens. and Reps. sign this pledge. But in good news, this week House Republicans passed the Balanced Budget Amendment out of Committee on a 20-12 vote! This Amendment is now being to the floor for consideration. The resolution H.J. Res 1 requires that Congress not spend more than it receives in revenues, requires the President to submit a balanced budget to Congress, and requires a 3/5 majority vote to increase the debt limit.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas) said "Since 1960, the annual federal budget has been balanced only six times and the federal deficit has climbed from $300 billion in 1960 to over $14 trillion today. America cannot continue to run huge federal budget deficits. Financing federal overspending through continued borrowing threatens to drown Americans in high taxes and heavy debt."

Polls show that 95% of Americans believe the deficit is a problem and that 65% of Americans are in favor of a balanced budget amendment. We need make permanent cuts to federal spending. We need cuts that cannot be undone by future Congresses. A constitutional amendment is the only answer.

This is a huge victory for America! As this is an amendment it will require a 2/3 majority or 290 votes to pass. With only 242 Republicans we need to persuade 43 Democrats to vote yes. Please help us pressure Democrats by choosing that option when you sign our fax petition today...

SELECT HERE TO SIGN new PETITION TO STOP TAXING CHURCHES, STOP RAISING THE NATIONAL DEBT CEILING, AND BALANCE THE BUDGET, and we will fax 535 Members of the House and Senate instantly, (saving you much time!)

President Obama continued his attack on American values and Churches by releasing his updated budget plan, which now includes indirectly taxing American Churches and Charities by eliminating tax-deductions for charitable giving, and home-mortgages.

CNN Money News just reported "The president once again proposed in his budget to curtail high-income earners' tax deduction for mortgage interest payments and charitable contributions. Under his proposal, taxpayers in the 33% and 35% tax brackets would only be able to deduct their [church or charity] contributions and mortgage interest payments at the 28% rate."

In other words, Obama wants to take money out of your church's offering plate, and hurt the helpers, damaging their ability to serve the poor and preach the gospel of Jesus Christ. People in those brackets who donate to churches will be effectively double-taxed, paying more taxes because they give to charity, which directly decreases their ability to donate.

"While charities don't have the same spending power on lobbyists, they also plan to make their voices heard," said CNN, quoting Tim Delaney, head of the National Council of Nonprofits. "Limiting the charitable deduction will likely curtail large donations to charities for the arts, environment, education and other sectors [i.e. churches]. This would come at a tough time for many charities since they are seeing donations drop, while the demand for their services rises."

CNN reported the 54 most generous donors in America gave only $3.3 billion in 2010, the smallest sum since 2000, according to a ranking compiled by The Chronicle of Philanthropy and Slate magazine. "Charities...are very reliant on donations from the wealthy, who like their tax breaks. The deduction isn't the sole motivation, but it is significant," said Ken Berger, chief executive of Charity Navigator, which evaluates non-profits' fiscal operations.

Can you believe the gall of this President? How dare he try to tax church offering plates! Rather than reduce government spending, he wants to raise the national debt ceiling limit, keep wasteful government spending, raise taxes, and now tax your church offering plates. Let's take a stand by demanding Congress reverse this evil plan. Sign our brand new petition today!

SELECT HERE TO SIGN new PETITION TO STOP TAXING CHURCHES, STOP RAISING THE NATIONAL DEBT CEILING, AND BALANCE THE BUDGET, and we will fax 535 Members of the House and Senate instantly, (saving you much time!)

But here's the good news. The Senate voted 58-40 for a non-binding "sense of the Senate" resolution drafted by Senator Lee (R-UT), and is growing toward the 67 votes needed to pass such a resolution. Your faxes are making a difference! Let's again petition Congress to let them know we are not going to let the left send this country into more debt. We are not going to stop fighting just because Obama and Reid want to pay for abortions. Let's demand all 100 Senators and all 435 Congressmen support the Balanced Budget Amendment. Call your two Senators at 202-225-3121 today, and then let's fax all 100.

As the national debt clock surpassed $14,000,000,000,000 (Trillion) or $45,000 per U.S. Citizen, the Congress is debating whether to A) legally raise the national debt ceiling from $14.3T, or B) default on our debt obligations to China, or C) enact massive spending cuts to shrink the size of the federal government. Personally, I vote C, don't you? Heroic Senator James DeMint (R-SC) is leading the charge to pass a Balanced Budget Amendment (BBA) to the Constitution, which does 3 things:

* Requires Congress to balance the federal budget each year.
* Prevents Congress from spending more than 20 percent of GDP.
* Requires a 2/3 super-majority vote to raise taxes.

SELECT HERE TO SIGN new PETITION TO STOP TAXING CHURCHES, STOP RAISING THE NATIONAL DEBT CEILING, AND BALANCE THE BUDGET, and we will fax 535 Members of the House and Senate instantly, (saving you much time!)

Friends, our nation stands in grave danger of bankruptcy that would hurt every American. Let's take a stand today, and demand Congress pass the Balanced Budget Amendment.

 

 

 

 


 

Funding for La Raza, an agency that supports sedition and treason, has increased substantially under Barack Obama!


The National Council of La Raza claims to be nonpartisan, and it collects federal funding, however, its views are clearly aligned with the Democratic party. Many of La Raza's members donate extensively to Democrats and Barack Obama, and several of them even have positions in his administration!

Recently, Barack Obama gave a speech to the National Council of La Raza, trying to them to help him maintain support for his reelection from the Latino community, which shows signs of abandoning him in 2012.

While many Hispanic see how bad Barack Obama has been for them personally, La Raza has clearly been a shill for the Obama administration, trying to turn every issue into something that is racially charged, including the financial takeover bill Dodd-Frank. They even lobbied for the dreadful Elizabeth Warren to run the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Before Dodd-Frank was signed into law, Obama gave La Raza special access to the White House by providing an administration official to speak to their followers. This was clearly a reward for their support.

La Raza runs countless ads promoting liberal ideology in order to support Barack Obama. And Obama, in return rewards them with continued special White House access and increased funding for their radical views.

Organizations like La Raza, which take taxpayer dollars and use them to promote a biased ideology should be defunded. Taxpayers should NOT be funding radical organizations that advocate racism and breaking the law. La Raza is especially bad because not only are they in Obama's back pocket, but they don't think crossing the border illegally is a crime but rather believe that all illegal aliens should be granted amnesty.

call CONGRESS to tell them that NO TAXPAYER DOLLARS should be going to La Raza.

WHY are American citizens being forced to contribute to organizations LIKE "LA RAZA," that are threatening the overthrow of the American Southwest?

"La Raza" is made up of many radical groups that aim to abolish all immigration laws and teach "La Reconquista" in schools to Latino students. In essence, students are taught that Europe STOLE southwest America from Mexico and that this region must be "reconquered."

...and YOUR TAX DOLLARS are paying for their activities!

The most radical of the organizations that make up "La Raza" is Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan (MEChA). This organization HATES AMERICA. Since the 1960's, this racist group has been indoctrinating students on college campuses. MEChA OPPOSES the assimilation of immigrants into the American way of life.

In 2006, MEChA posted the following statement on the University of Orgeon's website:


"In the spirit of a new people that is conscious not only of its proud historical heritage but also of the brutal gringo invasion of our territories, we, the Chicano inhabitants and civilizers of the northern land of Aztlan from whence came our forefathers, reclaiming the land of their birth and consecrating the determination of our people of the sun, declare that the call of our blood is our power, our responsibility, and our inevitable destiny."

"La Raza" opposes any kind of immigration enforcement, opposes border security, and efforts to stop illegal aliens from voting. They also believe that illegal aliens deserve licenses and welfare.

They believe in racially divisive education that teaches Hispanic students that everything about American laws and culture are racist.

Organizations like La Raza, which take taxpayer dollars and use them to promote a biased ideology should be defunded. Taxpayers should NOT be funding radical organizations that advocate racism and breaking the law. La Raza is especially bad because not only are they in Obama's back pocket, but they don't think crossing the border illegally is a crime but rather believe that all illegal aliens should be granted amnesty.

Call CONGRESS to tell them that NO TAXPAYER DOLLARS should be going to this organization.

The "La Raza" movement teaches that California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, Utah, Colorado, Oregon and parts of Washington State rightfully belong to Mexico. They urge legal and illegal immigrants to claim these lands and thus destroy the current U.S. borders.

This is what they call "Reconquista," or reconquest.

Remember the hundreds of thousands of illegals who marched on our cities and demanded their "rights", claiming we are on their territory, claiming loyalty to Mexico, and ignoring, even mocking, our rule of law? La Raza considers these protestors an "Army of Invaders" that is helping to achieve a takeover of the American Southwest through immigration...even force, if necessary.

Mexican American Legal Defense Fund founder Mario Obledo stated, "California is going to be a Hispanic state. Anyone who doesn't like it should leave. People who don't like such demographic changes should go back to Europe."

THIS IS WHERE YOUR TAX DOLLARS ARE GOING!

Organizations like La Raza, which take taxpayer dollars and use them to promote a biased ideology should be defunded. Taxpayers should NOT be funding radical organizations that advocate racism and breaking the law. La Raza is especially bad because not only are they in Obama's back pocket, but they don't think crossing the border illegally is a crime but rather believe that all illegal aliens should be granted amnesty.

tell CONGRESS to tell them that NO TAXPAYER DOLLARS should be going to this organization.

After the American southwest is flooded with immigrants, "La Raza" plans to ethnically cleanse the area. Miguel Perez of the Cal State-Northridge MEChA chapter has said, "The ultimate ideology is the liberation of Aztlan. Communism would be closest [to it]. Once Aztlan is established, ethnic cleansing would commence: Non-Chicanos would have to be expelled - opposition groups would be quashed because you have to keep power."


"La Raza" uses its non-profit status to take money for American taxpayers and use that money to push its racially-divisive agenda. They use OUR TAXPAYER DOLLARS to lobby Congress for MORE money.


Americans are sick of the out-of-control spending in Washington, and giving taxpayer dollars to radical, racist, Anti-American organizations that support a "RECONQUEST" of part of the United States of America. No budget cut has been so frighteningly obvious as the need to stop giving money to organizations that HATE US.

We cannot let the "La Raza" movement indoctrinate our children with false history or lobby Congress for our income any further. Please Fax every Member of Congress now and stop this movement from spreading hate...don't let America lose our national identity and our sovereignty by not confronting these cultural terrorists before it's too late!

 


The challenges America faces may appear overwhelming. But you and I both know that if we adhere to the founding principles of individual liberty, federalism, and truly limited government, there is no obstacle the American people cannot overcome.

 

But the forces driving our country away from those First Principles are strong. They demand an ever-increasing growth in government, higher and higher taxes, and a judiciary that makes law and social policy instead of sticking to the wisdom of the Constitution.

It’s clear that we need men and women in Washington and in the statehouses across America who believe, as we do, in the fundamental principles of limited government restricted by enumerated powers.

That is why I an announcing the formation of Fred PAC, a political action committee dedicated to helping elect candidates who stand for the principles you and I hold dear – principles that are the only sure salvation for America.

Please visit our website at www.FredPAC.com. Learn how you can help.

Your support and assistance has meant a great deal to me and my family as we defended America ’s First Principles. I know that in the days ahead we will continue in the fight for a strong, free, secure America … together.

Beware Obamacare's Fine Print
Congress's Health Care Double Standard

there is a plan for us ....and then there's a plan for them..
because they are better than us..

 

The goal would be to restrict care for the general public in order to control costs, while making sure Congress gets the gold-plated attention it's accustomed to. Ultimately, the rest of us would be asked to trade a private insurance company as gatekeeper for a government gatekeeper. The difference, of course, is that most of us can fire our insurance gatekeeper. Just try to do that once the government fills that role.

read more

As the U.S. Office of Personnel Management notes, Members of Congress "enjoy the widest selection of health plans in the country." According to page 114 of the Kennedy bill, a similar array of choices would not be available to other Americans in the future. Instead, they would be shunted into health insurance plans under the straightjacket of whatever the government decides is a "basic" plan.

There's a reason the Obama health care plan is being rushed through Congress this summer --

because the American people would likely never support it if given time to absorb and understand such fine print. If the union carve-out isn't sufficient to excite public anger, wait till you hear about the version of the Obama plan prepared by Senator Edward Kennedy,

which would specifically exempt Members of Congress from many of its provisions.

Because we don`t want Gov. Health Care we are call rabble,nazis' and racists.

those who want this are the nazis',racist,and they don't want us to have free speach when it goes agaist them or their ideas..

We the People" need to read this and prepare ourselves
> for more Tea Parties and to get more involved. I
> know I am!

For too long we have
> allowed the
> wrong people to make the worst possible decisions

read more

Senators take aim at Sotomayor's record
- The Wall Street Journal
Senate Republicans took aim Wednesday at Judge Sonia Sotomayor's views on gun rights, saying that as a federal appeals court judge in New York, she had dismissed the right to bear arms as not "fundamental" and complaining that she had ruled that only the federal government, not the states, can enforce the Second Amendment.

Canada: Gun registry hasn't 'saved a single life'
- The National Post
As Parliament breaks for summer, the opposition is mobilizing to stop a private member's bill to scrap the long gun registry. Yet there is no convincing research showing that the gun registry has saved a single life.

The 8 Republicans Who Gave America the Finger

The eight who voted for cap and trade are:

Bono Mack (CA) 202-225-5330
Castle (DE) 202-225-4165
Kirk (IL) 202-225-4835
Lance (NJ) 202-225-5361
Lobiondo (NJ) 202-225-6572
McHugh (NY) 202-225-4611
Reichart (WA) 202-225-7761
Chris Smith (NJ) 202-225-3765

Bachmann: Cap & Trade Is Choice Of "Liberty And Tyranny"

The Congresswoman says she chooses liberty

Eight Republicans Help Confirm a Hard-Core Gun Banner
-- And how to keep Senators from "spinning" their support for gun
control
http://www.gunowners.org
The back-stabbing Senators are: Lamar Alexander (R-TN), Susan Collins
(R-ME), Judd Gregg (R-NH), Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Richard Lugar (R-IN), Mel
Martinez (R-FL), Olympia Snowe (R-ME) and George Voinovich (R-OH).

read more

 

 

 

Raise your voice on this

Regulatory Czar

read more

The blame for the current condition is not all the Democrats fault or Republicans, its the fault of left wing groups that want to shove down our throats their idea of whats good for us.They have an its our way or else attitude. They think they know better than the people themselves. These socialists on both sides in both parties need to be fired or impeached.

these czars have to be stopped,they are appoined and can do whatever the people in control want.we don't need them to tell us whats good for us,we don't need them interpeting our laws to serve there agenda.Believe me they will tweek the laws over a period of time to transform America into somthing it shouldn't be, and will tear our constitution to shreds.
WE need to vote out these people before its to late,our present course is not the correct course,and the American people need to wake up before its too late.

At the beginning of the Twentieth Century, the democrats had a weak
political party, eager for any new members. The left seized the
opportunity and registered as democrats. They were aware that both
parties are open to any one who registers in either party. So they joined both.

Socialists could easily register as Democrats and campaign on any
issue to get elected rather than campaigning on socialist programs --
say anything to win the office, then legislate as they please once in
office..........

The newest one:
*This time it's the proposed "Regulatory Czar" who will be coming to a vote this week in the U.S. Senate.

His name is Cass Sunstein, and he holds some of the kookiest views you will ever hear.

go here for more

23 State Attorneys General To Attorney General Holder: "No Semi-Auto Ban"
On June 11, the top law enforcement officials of nearly half the states signed a letter to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, expressing their opposition to reinstatement of the federal ban on semi-automatic firearms.

 

We should not be prosecuting people who are our first line of defense against the enemys of this country.

 

 

Raise your voice on this

Regulatory Czar

read more

 

Big Brother's New Target: Tracking Firearms (H.R. 45)

65 House Dems Oppose Reinstatement Of 1994 Gun Ban

S. 941: The “Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Reform and Firearms Modernization Act of 2009”

Organization of American States Treaty on Firearms Trafficking

"Encoded Ammunition"/Bullet Serialization

.nraila.org/Issues/

Did You Know
NRA helped to write the federal law prohibiting the manufacture of handgun ammunition capable of defeating bullet resistant vests.

The anti-gun lobby lies when it claims NRA opposed the law.

learn more on the next page

NRA-ILA RSS Feed
http://www.nraila.org/xml/RSS.aspx

NRA-ILA News Web Service
(News stories from the web)
http://www.nraila.org/Services/News.asmx?WSDL

NRA-ILA News and Alerts Web Service
(News stories and Legislative alerts)
http://www.nraila.org/Services/NewsAndUpdates.asmx?WSDL

NRA-ILA Legislative Updates Web Service
(Legislative Alerts)
http://www.nraila.org/Services/LegislativeUpdates.asmx?WSDL

NRA-ILA Hunting and Conservation Updates Web Service
(News stories, Press Releases, and Legislative Updates concerning Hunting and Conservation issues)
http://www.nraila.org/Services/HuntingAndConservation.asmx?WSDL

When President Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, said, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste,” he may have been talking about the economy, but his friends in the anti-gun movement heard him loud and clear. Now, they’ve discovered the latest crisis they can use to attack our Second Amendment rights: the explosion of violent crime committed by drug cartels in Mexico.read more

 

Assault Weapons" 2009
03/27/09 - Legislation to require a federal license to possess any detachable-magazine, semi-automatic rifle or shotgun, or any handgun, has been introduced in Congress. Legislation to reimpose the federal “assault weapon” and “large capacity” magazine ban of 1994, or an even broader ban--both introduced in the last two congresses--is sure to follow. And legislation to ban all semi-automatic and pump-action firearms, starting with those that use detachable magazines, has been pro-posed in the past and may not be far behind.
Read more

“Defeating any new ban will depend, in part, upon how well you and I make our case to the American people, including some gun owners who so far haven’t cared what gun is banned, so long as it’s not theirs.”

It Didn't Happen Overnight

by Sen. H. L. Richardson (Ret.)

Gun Owners of America
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
http://www.gunowners.org


Because of my many years as a conservative in elected office, I have
been asked by others, "how did we get in this mess we are in?" The
great author Robert Louis Stevenson wisely said, "Sooner or later in
life, we all sit down to a banquet of consequences."

That's what's happening now, we're at the banquet.

Here is a brief synopsis of how it happened.

Many Americans believe that the core religious values, which founded
and sustained this nation, have not only been sadly neglected but
also forgotten. In so doing, the public is finding out what political
ignorance and religious apathy has created. While godly people
snoozed and gun owners were busy hunting, small minorities of
hedonists have inveigled their way into government and have been able to impose their political will upon the majority.

It didn't happen over night.

To understand, we have to go back one hundred years to the comments
of a very wise man, President Theodore Roosevelt. He stated, "There
are those who believe that a new modernity demands a new morality.
What they fail to consider is the harsh reality that there is no such
thing as a new morality. There is only one morality. There is only
true Christian ethics over against which stands the whole of
paganism. If we are to fulfill our great destiny as a people, then we
must return to the old morality, the sole morality."

Roosevelt saw moral slippage occurring at the beginning of the last
century. He saw radical activists proclaiming a "new morality"
embodying atheism and materialism. They were becoming increasingly
vocal on our college campuses and were becoming more active in
American politics, promoting their "new" morality. They were also
attempting to elect their candidates on the socialist ticket.

In the beginning, the Socialists and their allies were singularly
unsuccessful and remained small in number. The vast majority of
Americans were happy with our liberty, constitutional government,
free enterprise and politics implemented through the two party
system.

At the beginning of the last century, a socialist by the name of
Lenin, put wheels under the world socialist movement. He lead a small
minority of communists in overthrowing the czarist government in
Russia; in so doing, Lenin developed a financial base and a national
platform for the promotion of world socialism. After the First World
War, the hard core left became more politically active in the United
States. Lenin was an excellent organizer, and he and other socialist
leaders realized that it was an impossible task to sell their bad
tasting political medicine to the vast majority of Americans.

Norman Thomas, an early leader in the American socialist movement
promoted the concept that Americans would never knowingly adopt
socialism but, under the name of liberalism, they will adopt every
fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a
socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened.

The left abandoned their attempts to sell their socialist programs as
a third party and decided that there was more fertile political
ground within the two party system running as "liberals" and
"progressives."

At the beginning of the Twentieth Century, the democrats had a weak
political party, eager for any new members. The left seized the
opportunity and registered as democrats. They were aware that both
parties are open to any one who registers in either party.

The socialists recognized that to be a candidate, all you have to do
is register, be of age, alive, not a felon and have the money to
legally file for office. There is no political litmus test in either
party in order to be a member or a candidate.

Socialists could easily register as Democrats and campaign on any
issue to get elected rather than campaigning on socialist programs --
say anything to win the office, then legislate as they please once in
office.

The left-wing political leader ship recognized that by themselves,
they were only a tiny percentage of the American population. They
did, however, recognize that only one out of four Americans vote in
primary elections and therefore, a small percentage could nominate a
candidate in primary elections since multiple candidates often seek
the office.
The left saw that in local elections for school boards
and city council and supervisors, even smaller numbers could affect
the outcome. If their Socialists candidates won local offices, they
could establish a base of operations in order to move up step by step
to higher office, such as state representatives, state senators and
at a later opportunity, to Congress and the US Senate.

The following is an actual example of how a small minority can win a
major California State Senate office. Registration heavily favored
the Republican Party.

District population approximately 600,000
Those who could register to vote 400,000
Those who bothered to register 235,000
Total who voted in primary election 120,000
Republican primary vote 70,000
Democrat primary vote 50,000
Eight candidates sought the Republican nomination
The Republican winning candidate gained 16,000

And won handily. In the general election, he easily gained the senate
seat and served for 22 years. Is this race an exception? No! It
happens all the time. Realize the significance of only 16,000 votes
out of potentially 400,000 who could have participated. Think about
it. Is it any wonder that a small, dedicated minority of voters could
have a disproportionate impact on our government when three out of
four Americans don't even register or bother to take part in primary
elections, in the important process of selecting who their candidates
might be? It has been said that when one American was informed that
much of the country's population suffered from both political
ignorance and apathy. His yawning response was "I don't know and I
don't care."

The socialists, in democratic garb, had a long-range plan with little
to stand in their way
. Since they were atheists and agnostics, they
believed that any method that achieved socialist power was
"ethical."
The expression, "the end justifies the means" became their
motto and
method of operations. Deception and lying became the tools of their
trade.

During the latter 1800's and early 1900's, the socialist base was
still too small to elect their numbers to many offices; they needed
to attract additional support. Now clothed as liberals in democratic
garb, they increased their numbers by wooing small disgruntled and
politically isolated segments of the population, with future promises
of political advantage. Knowing that by adding small segment by
segment, their combined small numbers could add up enough votes to
win primary elections.

They first successfully impacted and wooed segments of the union
movement.
Then over the years, adding little segments one at a time,
they captured support from the homosexual community by sympathizing
with their "gay" activities. They attracted anti-war pacifists,
disgruntled feminists, the extreme environmentalists, gun control
supporters and any other dissident group that could be wooed with
future promises of legislative support
. Adopting "class action"
agitation, they pandered to any group they could exploit and bring on
board.

During the growth of their move towards power, the left wing
leadership wisely kept these segments separated, appealing to them
directly, and then, only to each one's special interest. They knew
there would be difficulties if they ever brought them all together,
for they certainly didn't want to have meetings of rank and file
union members with the "gay" community nor the elderly with
anti-war
activists.

The socialist knew that, with accurate polling information, they
could campaign on issues that they didn't really believe -- but
appealed to the average voter; they didn't have to broadcast who
their real supporters happened to be. The great depression of the
1930's brought the democrats into national power at all levels of
government, including a segment of the "liberal" Democrats. The
majority of the Democratic legislators elected during the 1930's and
1940's were still traditional Americans in their ethics and values.
However, few old-line Democrats saw trouble brewing and the shift in
leadership taking place within their own party. The old time Democrat
found out soon enough when he found himself gerrymandered out of his seat and replaced by a young leftist.

At the present time, the good ole hard working jackass, the symbol of
the Democrats, should have been changed to the condor; a bird far
more in keeping with the leftward slant of their party.

A condor is a large ugly vulture, which feeds on carrion. It stays
afloat on hot air and deserts its young when frightened. Its defense
mechanism is to throw up, barf a stream of semi-digested meat on its
enemies. The bird can't survive near civilization and is becoming
extinct in proximity to civilized society. To keep it alive in
California, the government now subsidizes its food. It survives quite
well in backward South American countries. Could anyone think of a
more appropriate symbol for a left-wing socialist movement?

Over many years, the planned "liberal leftist" control over
the inner workings of the Democrat party structure increased dramatically.

Working together as an organized minority during the nineteen fifties
and sixties, the leftists set forth to take control of the Democrat
party leadership. Achieving substantial success, they then moved to
influence the Republican Party as well, running their candidates as
liberals or "moderate" Republicans. RINOs (Republican In Name Only)
became a small dissident element in the Republican Party as well.
Small but mouthy, they are the croaking frogs on republican lily
pads.

While in office, during the 1970's and 1980's, I saw the left grasp
control over the political fortunes of the Democrat party, On a first
hand basis, right before my own eyes, I watched it happen. Today, the
socialists are the dominant voice in its elected leadership.
Whenever
the opportunity presented itself, they effectively and systematically
eliminated conservative democrat office holders within their ranks.
Because the Left now controls leadership, they control candidate
funding, thereby controlling who wish to be elected and leveraging
Democrat incumbents who wish to be returned to office.

A very conspicuous case of rooting out non-conforming members of the
Democrat party is the primary election defeat of Sen. Joe Lieberman
in Connecticut. In six years this long-time Senator went from
national icon of the Democrat party to pariah. The message is the
same -- tow the line, or else.

Over the past fifty years, controlling the vast wealth created
through taxation, they have built a huge federal, state and local
bureaucracy which not only employs their own kind but implements a
wealth of programs that reflects the wishes of their base, the
unions, the gays, the feminists the anti war pacifists, the gun
controllers, etc. Through laws, they have dramatically increased
their power and have done what Norman Thomas hoped would happen.

The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under
the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the
socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation
without ever knowing how it happened.

Fortunately, a number of Americans are aware of how it's happening
and are trying to inform their fellow Americans. Millions of
Americans still hold to the core traditional and religious values
that founded this nation and, properly informed, are working
diligently to see the left in both parties are routed out of our
Constitutional government.

The first glimmer of hope came with the republican nomination of
Barry Goldwater for president in the 1960's. Although he was soundly
defeated in the general election, he defeated in the primary, the
darling of the left leaning republicans, Nelson Rockefeller.
Conservatives rallied to work for Goldwater and didn't quit working
after his defeat. In California, in 1966, they defeated another
"moderate" in the primary by nominating and electing as governor,
something as rare as a right-winger in Hillary Clinton's staff -- a
conservative actor.

The fledgling American core value revolt was under way. A voice was
raised promoting our traditions and our ethics: activist
organizations began to crop all over America -- politically
unsophisticated but eager to learn. Fourteen years later, they
nominated and elected Ronald Reagan to the presidency.

In 1994, the Lower House of Congress went republican and its
leadership shifted toward conservatism. Was liberalism dead? Not by a
long sight. They had managed to control both houses of Congress for
forty years. The Republicans held narrow margins but with a few
"moderate" RINOs in their midst, their control is iffy. The lefties
were deeply imbedded in the Northeastern states and were the
controlling factor in most large cities.

However, they were increasingly having problems within their own
ranks. The splinter groups they'd attracted and wooed began to make
demands. They had contributed to the democrat victories, now they
wanted their reward. They wanted more of their own elected to office
and they wanted their issues enacted into law. Instead of being
splinter groups kept in the closet, they demanded to be heard, and
their wishes subsequently become part of our laws.

They got their wish and, and the dissidents are now running the
"Democratic" party. The tail is now wagging the old
"Democrat
"
donkey. The anti-war, pro-abort, environmental extremists, soft on
crime, big spending liberals
, feminists and deviants of both sexes
are calling the political tune and are marching hand in hand in gay
parades. The large body of old rank and file Democrats are scratching
their heads and wondering, "What's going on?"

Big changes are now occurring. The South, traditionally Democrat but
fundamentally religious, has turned Republican. Not because of any
great love for the Republican structure, but because of their disgust
over the present leftward drift of their own party.

Amongst elected democrats, hoping to seek higher office and
recognizing that the new base of the party has become a collection of
wacko wonks, are trying to cover and obfuscate this fact by
constantly attacking their opposition as "extreme," haters of the
poor or religious bigots. Their rhetoric borders the wild -- trying
to please their base while seeking to appear as moderate to the
average voter. It ain't working.

They are in trouble and they know it. The governmental bureaucracy,
which houses and provides jobs for their supporters, is being
threatened. Their economic base is vulnerable and their future is
suspect. How can they send Junior and Zelda to Harvard if they are
outa' work? Therefore, their attacks are becoming more vicious and
the thin veneer of civility is wearing off their "democratic"
facade.


There is a truism in economic circles, "bad money drives out good."
The same thing is true in politics. Bad people drive out good ones.
In the "Democratic" party that rule is holding true. Bad democrats
drive out good ones
. In rural America, the trend is decidedly towards
basic American values. Who would have believed forty years ago, that
below the Mason Dixon Line, the South would turn Republican? Or that
rock-ribbed republican New Englanders would tolerate Barney Frank or
Ted Kennedy in office?

The left hasn't gained total control, for if they had, they'd have
made it a "crime" for me to write what I have just written.
There is
still time to turn it all around and get the buggers out of
government.
I know it's possible and so does the left, which is why,
when challenged, and a conservative leaning judge is appointed to the
Supreme Court, the thin veneer of civility rubs off for all to see.
We are now witnessing how uncivil and uncouth they really are.

They started as a minority and still are a minority. The big
difference is that over the last hundred years, they have embedded
themselves and their unworkable policies in all facets of government
-- including education and segments of the major media.

They can be routed out but they won't go willingly. They have worked
hard to get where they are and are going to see that all their
socialist programs are going to be shoved down our collective
throats. They are nasty people. Rub off that thin veneer of civility
and see for yourselves.

Theodore Roosevelt also said, "All those blatant sham reformers, in
the name of new morality, preach the old, old vice and self
indulgence which rotted out first, the moral fiber and then even the
external greatness of Greece and Rome."

Is America next? Are we to be "rotted out by sham reformers?"
Are we
to be apathetic Americans who say, "I don't know and I don't
care!"?

I don't think so. I believe we are at the banquet and Americans are
feasting on the political consequences of the last one hundred years.
They don't like the taste of the political concoctions they've been
fed and are demanding and working for change.